UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs Arctic Sound 2T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameArctic SoundRocket Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2021 (4 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680 ×232
Core clock speed900 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Wattno data
Texture fill rate216.0 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power13.82 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs120 ×2no data
TMUs240 ×2no data
L2 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eno data
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

Arctic Sound 2T has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound 2T and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 9 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound 2T or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.