ATI Radeon X1300 CE vs Arctic Sound 2T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameArctic SoundRV505
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2021 (4 years ago)27 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680 ×2no data
Core clock speed900 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate216.0 ×21.400
Floating-point processing power13.82 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs120 ×24
TMUs240 ×24
L2 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eDDR2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×2128 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s ×26.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.63.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 10 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 27 Watt

Arctic Sound 2T has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1300 CE, on the other hand, has 1751.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound 2T and Radeon X1300 CE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1300 CE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T
ATI Radeon X1300 CE
Radeon X1300 CE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1300 CE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound 2T or Radeon X1300 CE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.