Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Arctic Sound 2T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated79
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data78.91
Power efficiencyno data17.34
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameArctic SoundNavi 33
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2021 (3 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76802048
Core clock speed900 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2755 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate216.0352.6
Floating-point processing power13.82 TFLOPS22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs12064
TMUs240128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm204 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 190 Watt

RX 7600 XT has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 163.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound 2T and Radeon RX 7600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 395 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.