ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit vs Arctic Sound 2T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameArctic SoundR350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2021 (5 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680 ×2no data
Core clock speed900 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate216.0 ×23.040
Floating-point processing power13.82 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs120 ×28
TMUs240 ×28
L2 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eDDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×2128 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s ×29.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 10 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 47 Watt

Arctic Sound 2T has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 128-bit, on the other hand, has 963.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound 2T and Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound 2T or Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.