Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 vs Arctic Sound 2T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameArctic SoundBanks
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2021 (4 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680 ×2320
Core clock speed900 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate216.0 ×220.60
Floating-point processing power13.82 TFLOPS ×20.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs120 ×28
TMUs240 ×220
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cache8 MB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×22 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s ×216 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.66.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 50 Watt

Arctic Sound 2T has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

520 Mobile DDR3, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound 2T and Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T
AMD Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3
Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound 2T or Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.