Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile vs Arctic Sound 1T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameArctic SoundRenoir
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2021 (5 years ago)6 January 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144384
Core clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate172.836.00
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS1.152 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs19224
L2 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 384SP Mobile has a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 2233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound 1T and Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound 1T is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate Arctic Sound 1T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 9 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound 1T or Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.