GeForce MX550 vs Arctic Sound 1T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated465
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.05
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameArctic SoundTU117S
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2021 (4 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61441024
Core clock speed900 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1320 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate172.842.24
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS2.703 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs19232
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache8 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 25 Watt

Arctic Sound 1T has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce MX550, on the other hand, has 1300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound 1T and GeForce MX550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound 1T is a workstation graphics card while GeForce MX550 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound 1T
Arctic Sound 1T
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GeForce MX550

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate Arctic Sound 1T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 901 votes

Rate GeForce MX550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound 1T or GeForce MX550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.