TITAN Ada vs Arc Pro A60

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking232not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.91no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-256AD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 June 2023 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204818432
Core clock speed900 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors11,500 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate262.41,452
Floating-point processing power8.397 TFLOPS92.9 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs128576
Tensor Cores256576
Ray Tracing Cores16144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Width1-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount12 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s1.15 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.01x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 800 Watt

Arc Pro A60 has 515.4% lower power consumption.

TITAN Ada, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Pro A60 and TITAN Ada. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Pro A60 is a workstation graphics card while TITAN Ada is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Pro A60
Arc Pro A60
NVIDIA TITAN Ada
TITAN Ada

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 23 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate TITAN Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.