Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU vs Arc Graphics 140V
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 434 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe² (2024) | no data |
| GPU code name | Lunar Lake iGPU | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 24 September 2024 (1 year ago) | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 16 |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 3 nm | 3 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR5x-8533 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 September 2024 | 30 October 2024 |
Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU has an age advantage of 1 month.
We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 140V and M4 Pro 16-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook graphics card while Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
