Radeon RX 8800 XT vs Arc A770

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking155not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.27no data
Power efficiency10.33no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 4.0
GPU code nameDG2-512Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964096
Core clock speed2100 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate614.4622.1
Floating-point processing power19.66 TFLOPS19.91 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs256256
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.01x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 220 Watt

RX 8800 XT has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 2.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A770 and Radeon RX 8800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
Radeon RX 8800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5276 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 80 votes

Rate Radeon RX 8800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.