CMP 100HX-210 vs Arc A530M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking315not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.01no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameDG2-256GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2023 (1 year ago)2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15365120
Core clock speed900 MHz555 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1147 MHz
Number of transistors11,500 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8367.0
Floating-point processing power3.994 TFLOPS11.75 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs96320
Tensor Cores192640
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz810 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s829.4 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 250 Watt

Arc A530M has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 284.6% lower power consumption.

CMP 100HX-210, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Arc A530M and CMP 100HX-210. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A530M is a notebook card while CMP 100HX-210 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
CMP 100HX-210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 210 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate CMP 100HX-210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A530M or CMP 100HX-210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.