UHD Graphics 32EU vs Arc A380

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking328not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.57no data
Power efficiency14.90no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameDG2-128Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 June 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024256
Core clock speed2000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate131.224.80
Floating-point processing power4.198 TFLOPS0.7936 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6416
Tensor Cores128no data
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Length222 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width96 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1937 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth186.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2022 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

Arc A380 has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 32EU, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A380 and UHD Graphics 32EU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A380
Arc A380
Intel UHD Graphics 32EU
UHD Graphics 32EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 808 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 32EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.