RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs Arc A380

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking331not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.70no data
Power efficiency14.92no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128AD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date14 June 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10245120
Core clock speed2000 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate131.2247.2
Floating-point processing power4.198 TFLOPS15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64160
Tensor Cores128160
Ray Tracing Cores840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length222 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB12 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1937 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth186.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

Arc A380 has 33.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc A380 and RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A380 is a desktop card while RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A380
Arc A380
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 810 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.