Radeon RX 5950 vs Arc A350M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 418 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 40.16 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | DG2-128 | Navi 21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 March 2022 (3 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 4864 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1535 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 21,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 466.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.766 TFLOPS | 14.93 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 96 |
| TMUs | 48 | 304 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 350 Watt |
Arc A350M has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1300% lower power consumption.
RX 5950, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and Radeon RX 5950. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5950 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
