Jetson TX1 GPU vs Arc A350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking421not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.24no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameDG2-128GM20B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (3 years ago)4 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768256
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate55.2016.00
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPS0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs4816
Ray Tracing Cores6no data
L1 Cache1.1 MB96 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 4 January 2015
Chip lithography 6 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson TX1 GPU, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and Jetson TX1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
NVIDIA Jetson TX1 GPU
Jetson TX1 GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 76 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Jetson TX1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A350M or Jetson TX1 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.