GMA 3150 vs Arc A350M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3701547
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency39.88no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameDG2-128Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate55.200.8
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs241
TMUs482
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c
Shader Model6.63.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36no data
1440p16no data
4K9no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 19 no data
Far Cry 5 42 no data
Fortnite 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16 no data
Dota 2 62 no data
Far Cry 5 39 no data
Fortnite 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 47 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 26 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12 no data
Dota 2 59 no data
Far Cry 5 37 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 25 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12 no data
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 11 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15 no data
Valorant 70−75 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 6 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 13 Watt

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 92.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 57 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 142 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A350M or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.