Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU vs Arc A350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking352not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.66no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)no data
GPU code nameDG2-128no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed300 MHz1296 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate55.20no data
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs48no data
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 1 year.

Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 56 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 155 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.