Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Arc A350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameDG2-128Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2022 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816384
Core clock speed2000 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt2400 Watt
Texture fill rate96.001,638
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs24no data
TMUs481024
Tensor Cores961024
Ray Tracing Cores6128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1937 MHz1565 MHz
Memory bandwidth124.0 GB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 2400 Watt

Arc A350 has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 9500% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350 and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A350 is a desktop card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350
Arc A350
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Arc A350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 116 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.