Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile vs Arc A310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking289not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe HPG (2020−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)
GPU code nameAlchemistBarcelo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2022 (1 year ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6448
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million10,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt (40 - 75 Watt TGP)45 Watt
Texture fill rate64.0050.40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc A310 and Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed15500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth124.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2022 6 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between Arc A310 and Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A310
Arc A310
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 230 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.