GMA vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3051538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUCloverview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm32 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.066
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_29.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno dataES 2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36no data
1440p20no data
4K15no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 26 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 26 no data
Forza Horizon 4 71 no data
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 23 no data
Dota 2 25 no data
Far Cry 5 34 no data
Fortnite 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 59 no data
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 25 no data
Metro Exodus 29 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data
World of Tanks 220−230 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 46 no data
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 11 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data
World of Tanks 120−130 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30 no data
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Dota 2 9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 15 no data
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2023 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm

Arc 8-Core iGPU has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc 8-Core iGPU and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Intel GMA
GMA

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 54 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.