Arc Graphics 130T vs Arc 8-Core iGPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU and Arc Graphics 130T, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms Arc Graphics 130T by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 340 | 366 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | Xe+ (2025) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 7 |
| Boost clock speed | 2300 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 35
+16.7%
| 30−35
−16.7%
|
| 1440p | 17
+21.4%
| 14−16
−21.4%
|
| 4K | 14
+16.7%
| 12−14
−16.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 111
+24.7%
|
85−90
−24.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+9.1%
|
30−35
−9.1%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 40
+21.2%
|
30−35
−21.2%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+9%
|
65−70
−9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85
−4.7%
|
85−90
+4.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+9.1%
|
30−35
−9.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39
−30.8%
|
50−55
+30.8%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+6.9%
|
85−90
−6.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+9.2%
|
65−70
−9.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+10.2%
|
45−50
−10.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+10.3%
|
55−60
−10.3%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+6.3%
|
120−130
−6.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+9%
|
65−70
−9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 42
−112%
|
85−90
+112%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+5.9%
|
200−210
−5.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+9.1%
|
30−35
−9.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 36
−41.7%
|
50−55
+41.7%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+6.9%
|
85−90
−6.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+9.2%
|
65−70
−9.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+10.2%
|
45−50
−10.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 25
−136%
|
55−60
+136%
|
| Metro Exodus | 28
−17.9%
|
30−35
+17.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+10.3%
|
55−60
−10.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 48
+14.3%
|
40−45
−14.3%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+6.3%
|
120−130
−6.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+9%
|
65−70
−9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+9.1%
|
30−35
−9.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 34
−50%
|
50−55
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+9.2%
|
65−70
−9.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+10.3%
|
55−60
−10.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
−75%
|
40−45
+75%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+11.7%
|
120−130
−11.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 90−95
+6.9%
|
85−90
−6.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+12.9%
|
30−35
−12.9%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+9.6%
|
110−120
−9.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 11
−127%
|
24−27
+127%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+15.7%
|
140−150
−15.7%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+6.3%
|
150−160
−6.3%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+11.4%
|
40−45
−11.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 32
−6.3%
|
30−35
+6.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+10.3%
|
35−40
−10.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+13%
|
21−24
−13%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 35−40
+11.4%
|
35−40
−11.4%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9
−222%
|
27−30
+222%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+9.1%
|
21−24
−9.1%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+11.6%
|
85−90
−11.6%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+13%
|
21−24
−13%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+11.8%
|
16−18
−11.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+11.1%
|
27−30
−11.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 16−18
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and Arc Graphics 130T compete in popular games:
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 17% faster in 1080p
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 21% faster in 1440p
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 17% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc 8-Core iGPU is 25% faster.
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 222% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is ahead in 43 tests (80%)
- Arc Graphics 130T is ahead in 11 tests (20%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.65 | 15.12 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 6 January 2025 |
Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 10.1% higher aggregate performance score.
Arc Graphics 130T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130T in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
