Radeon RX 7400 vs Arc 130T Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameArrow Lake-HNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)8 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961792
Core clock speed300 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate123.2257.6
Floating-point processing power3.942 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs2864
TMUs56112
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores728

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 January 2025 8 August 2025
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 43 Watt

Arc 130T Mobile has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 22.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.

We couldn't decide between Arc 130T Mobile and Radeon RX 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc 130T Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12 votes

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc 130T Mobile or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.