RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB vs Arc 130T Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe2-LPG (2025)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameArrow LakeGA107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962560
Core clock speed300 MHz1117 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1612 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate123.2129.0
Floating-point processing power3.942 TFLOPS8.253 TFLOPS
ROPs2848
TMUs5680
Tensor Cores11280
Ray Tracing Cores720

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 January 2025 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 3 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Arc 130T Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc 130T Mobile and RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc 130T Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB
RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc 130T Mobile or RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.