Titan X Pascal vs Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.16
Power efficiencyno data9.68
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2026 (less than a year ago)2 August 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores403584
Core clock speedno data1417 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,800 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data342.9
Floating-point processing powerno data10.97 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data224
L1 Cacheno data1.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5x-8533GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speed8533 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data480.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2026 2 August 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 9 years, and 233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Titan X Pascal. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Titan X Pascal is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 633 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 3014 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M5 Max 40-Core GPU or Titan X Pascal, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.