Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated508
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataXe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameno dataMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 March 2026 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores404
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Manufacturing process technologyno data5 nm
L1 Cacheno data768 KB

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5x-8533no data
Shared memoryno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2026 14 December 2023

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc). We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 629 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M5 Max 40-Core GPU or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.