Radeon RX 8040S vs Apple M4 16-core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616
Boost clock speedno data2800 MHz

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5x-8533no data
Shared memoryno data+
Resizable BAR-+

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between M4 16-core GPU and Radeon RX 8040S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M4 16-core GPU is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 8040S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 63 votes

Rate M4 16-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX 8040S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M4 16-core GPU or Radeon RX 8040S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.