Tesla T4G vs Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 November 2020 (5 years ago)13 September 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322560
Core clock speed1296 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1590 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data254.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.141 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5-6400GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2020 13 September 2018
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 70 Watt

Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU has an age advantage of 2 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 59.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between M1 Max 32-Core GPU and Tesla T4G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Tesla T4G is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU
NVIDIA Tesla T4G
Tesla T4G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 481 votes

Rate M1 Max 32-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla T4G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 Max 32-Core GPU or Tesla T4G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.