Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (5 years ago)31 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3248
Core clock speed1296 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)44 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5-6400no data
Memory bus width512 Bitno data
Shared memory++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2020 31 July 2025

Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has an age advantage of 4 years.

We couldn't decide between M1 Max 32-Core GPU and Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake). We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 483 votes

Rate M1 Max 32-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 Max 32-Core GPU or Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.