Radeon Pro W6400 vs Apple M1 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.18
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8768
Core clock speedno data2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2331 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data111.9
Floating-point processing powerno data3.58 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2020 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm

Apple M1 GPU has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between M1 GPU and Radeon Pro W6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M1 GPU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 GPU
M1 GPU
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 467 votes

Rate M1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 GPU or Radeon Pro W6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.