UHD Graphics 770 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Aggregated performance score
Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 129% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 346 | 547 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 20 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.27 |
| Architecture | no data | Alder Lake |
| GPU code name | no data | Alder Lake xG |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (3 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $878 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 26.40 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Apple M1 8-Core GPU and UHD Graphics 770 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1550 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 28
+64.7%
| 17
−64.7%
|
| 4K | 27−30
+108%
| 13
−108%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+83.3%
|
12
−83.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+142%
|
12−14
−142%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+76.9%
|
13
−76.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+153%
|
18−20
−153%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+100%
|
18−20
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+120%
|
10
−120%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+112%
|
17
−112%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+153%
|
14−16
−153%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+133%
|
21−24
−133%
|
| Hitman 3 | 35−40
+100%
|
19
−100%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+107%
|
14
−107%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+118%
|
10−12
−118%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27
+92.9%
|
14−16
−92.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+189%
|
9−10
−189%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+142%
|
12−14
−142%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+229%
|
7−8
−229%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+153%
|
18−20
−153%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+100%
|
18−20
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+125%
|
16
−125%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+153%
|
14−16
−153%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+133%
|
21−24
−133%
|
| Hitman 3 | 35−40
+375%
|
8
−375%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+383%
|
6
−383%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+340%
|
5
−340%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+118%
|
10−12
−118%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 32
+129%
|
14−16
−129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+61.1%
|
18
−61.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+189%
|
9−10
−189%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+142%
|
12−14
−142%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+229%
|
7−8
−229%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+153%
|
18−20
−153%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+157%
|
14
−157%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+153%
|
14−16
−153%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+133%
|
21−24
−133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+222%
|
9
−222%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+189%
|
9−10
−189%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+122%
|
9−10
−122%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12−14
−66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
+100%
|
9−10
−100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+250%
|
4−5
−250%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+625%
|
4−5
−625%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+156%
|
9−10
−156%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+257%
|
7−8
−257%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+200%
|
9−10
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+180%
|
5−6
−180%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+75%
|
8−9
−75%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+280%
|
5−6
−280%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 65% faster in 1080p
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 108% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 1000% faster than the UHD Graphics 770.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Apple M1 8-Core GPU surpassed UHD Graphics 770 in all 66 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.05 | 6.13 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
The Apple M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
