Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Aggregated performance score
Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by 55% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 344 | 444 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 49 |
| Architecture | no data | Vega (2017−2021) |
| GPU code name | no data | Vega |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (3 years ago) | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | - |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by 55% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by 7% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 28
+27.3%
| 22
−27.3%
|
| 1440p | 24−27
+50%
| 16
−50%
|
| 4K | 14−16
+40%
| 10
−40%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+15.8%
|
19
−15.8%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+52.6%
|
18−20
−52.6%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+15%
|
20
−15%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+23.1%
|
39
−23.1%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+44%
|
24−27
−44%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14
−57.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+63.6%
|
22
−63.6%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+40.7%
|
27
−40.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+56.3%
|
30−35
−56.3%
|
| Hitman 3 | 35−40
+52%
|
25
−52%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+45%
|
20
−45%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+9.1%
|
22
−9.1%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27
+17.4%
|
23
−17.4%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+23.8%
|
21
−23.8%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+52.6%
|
18−20
−52.6%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+43.8%
|
16
−43.8%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+45.5%
|
33
−45.5%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+44%
|
24−27
−44%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+120%
|
10
−120%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+80%
|
20
−80%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+52%
|
25
−52%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+56.3%
|
30−35
−56.3%
|
| Hitman 3 | 35−40
+81%
|
21
−81%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+81.3%
|
16
−81.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16
−37.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+100%
|
12
−100%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 32
+60%
|
20
−60%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21
−38.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+52.9%
|
17
−52.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+52.6%
|
18−20
−52.6%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+64.3%
|
14
−64.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+60%
|
30
−60%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+144%
|
9
−144%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+89.5%
|
19
−89.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+58.3%
|
24
−58.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+56.3%
|
30−35
−56.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+107%
|
14
−107%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+117%
|
12
−117%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+53.8%
|
12−14
−53.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
+46.7%
|
15
−46.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12
−66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+20%
|
10
−20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
+50%
|
12
−50%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+75%
|
8−9
−75%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−12
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21
−38.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+40%
|
5
−40%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+43.8%
|
16
−43.8%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+47.1%
|
17
−47.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+68.8%
|
16−18
−68.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+75%
|
8−9
−75%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+0%
|
8
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
+62.5%
|
8−9
−62.5%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6
−16.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6
−33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+100%
|
7−8
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+37.5%
|
8
−37.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+75%
|
8
−75%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+72.7%
|
10−12
−72.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 27.3% faster than RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in 1080p
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 50% faster than RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in 1440p
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 40% faster than RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 150% faster than the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000).
All in all, in popular games:
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 66 tests (97%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 14.04 | 9.06 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 7 January 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
The Apple M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
