RTX PRO 6000 vs Apollo Lake GT1 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated12
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.49
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1 5GB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14424064
Core clock speedno data2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,810
Floating-point processing powerno data115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs3176
TMUs18752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 6000 has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Apollo Lake GT1 5 and RTX PRO 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apollo Lake GT1 5 is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Apollo Lake GT1 5
Apollo Lake GT1 5
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Apollo Lake GT1 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 53 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Apollo Lake GT1 5 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.