Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Apollo Lake GT1 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1 5EXK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144384
Core clock speedno data835 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1058 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data33.86
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs316
TMUs1832
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)11.0 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Apollo Lake GT1 5 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Apollo Lake GT1 5 and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apollo Lake GT1 5 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Apollo Lake GT1 5
Apollo Lake GT1 5
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Apollo Lake GT1 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Apollo Lake GT1 5 or Quadro K2000M Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.