Radeon Pro W6300M vs ATI All-In-Wonder X800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR420Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date21 September 2004 (21 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed500 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2040 MHz
Number of transistors160 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00097.92
Floating-point processing powerno data3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s64 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 September 2004 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm

Pro W6300M has an age advantage of 17 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2067% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X800 and Radeon Pro W6300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder X800 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder X800 or Radeon Pro W6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.