Radeon 660M vs ATI All-In-Wonder X800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated570
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.80
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR420Rembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 September 2004 (21 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed500 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors160 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00045.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1624
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 September 2004 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X800 and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder X800 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder X800
All-In-Wonder X800
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 465 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder X800 or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.