CMP 50HX vs ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR420TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 April 2005 (20 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed425 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors160 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.400296.6
Floating-point processing powerno data11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB10 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 April 2005 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm

CMP 50HX has an age advantage of 16 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X800 SE and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder X800 SE is a desktop graphics card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE
All-In-Wonder X800 SE
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 77 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder X800 SE or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.