GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI All-In-Wonder X600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV370GT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 July 2005 (20 years ago)13 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed400 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors107 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6004.712
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2005 13 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 40 nm

ATI All-In-Wonder X600 PRO has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

9400 GT Rev. 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X600 PRO and GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder X600 PRO
All-In-Wonder X600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder X600 PRO or GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.