Radeon HD 7970M X2 vs ATI All-In-Wonder X1800 XL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameR520Wimbledon
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 October 2005 (20 years ago)24 April 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280 ×2
Core clock speed500 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors321 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00068.00 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data2.176 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs1680 ×2
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed500 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s153.6 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 October 2005 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 200 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder X1800 XL has 167% lower power consumption.

HD 7970M X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X1800 XL and Radeon HD 7970M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder X1800 XL is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7970M X2 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X1800 XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7970M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder X1800 XL or Radeon HD 7970M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.