UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated907
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.94
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameR200Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 November 2001 (23 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data24
Core clock speed230 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors60 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate1.840no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed190 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.08 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112_1
OpenGL1.4no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2001 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500
All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 60 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.