GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh vs ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR100TU106B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 July 2000 (24 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1920
Core clock speed166 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors30 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rate1144.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs6120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1353 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s259.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 July 2000 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 12 nm

RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh has an age advantage of 18 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 and GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200
All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 57 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.