Radeon RX 9060 XT vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated72
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.90
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRV635Navi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)18 May 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1202048
Core clock speed722 MHz2220 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3230 MHz
Number of transistors378 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate5.776413.4
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS26.46 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length232 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 18 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 150 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD has 172.7% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD and Radeon RX 9060 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder HD
All-In-Wonder HD
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT
Radeon RX 9060 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 569 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD or Radeon RX 9060 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.