Radeon R7 M270DX vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated904
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV635Topaz
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)11 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120384
Core clock speed722 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data940 MHz
Number of transistors378 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.77622.56
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length232 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed594 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 11 June 2014
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

R7 M270DX has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD and Radeon R7 M270DX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder HD is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 M270DX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder HD
All-In-Wonder HD
AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon R7 M270DX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M270DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD or Radeon R7 M270DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.