H3C XG310 vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRV635DG1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120768 ×4
Core clock speed722 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors378 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate5.77652.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs424 ×4
TMUs848 ×4
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length232 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed594 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s68.26 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 11 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 300 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD has 445% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder HD is a desktop graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.