ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV635Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)7 April 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1201600
Core clock speed722 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors378 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt208 Watt
Texture fill rate5.77666.00
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS2.64 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length232 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 7 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 208 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD has 278% lower power consumption.

ATI V8800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD and FirePro V8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder HD is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V8800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD or FirePro V8800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.