Arc A750 vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.60
Power efficiencyno data10.32
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV635DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1203584
Core clock speed722 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors378 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate5.776537.6
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs8224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L2 Cache128 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length232 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 225 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD has 309% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 817% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD and Arc A750. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1067 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD or Arc A750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.