Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRV635Mars
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)10 January 2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120384
Core clock speed722 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data700 MHz
Number of transistors378 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.77616.80
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS0.5376 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache128 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length232 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 10 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

R5 M240 Rebrand has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD 3650 and Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD 3650 or Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.