Radeon Pro 5700 vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated236
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.19
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRV635Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1202304
Core clock speed722 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors378 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate5.776194.4
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS6.221 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8144
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length232 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 130 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 has 136.4% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD 3650 and Radeon Pro 5700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650
All-In-Wonder HD 3650
AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD 3650 or Radeon Pro 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.