GeForce 8400M G vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.92
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV635G86
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1208
Core clock speed722 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors378 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate5.7763.200
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache128 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length232 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 9 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 10 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

8400M G, on the other hand, has 450% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD 3650 and GeForce 8400M G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8400M G is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650
All-In-Wonder HD 3650
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GeForce 8400M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD 3650 or GeForce 8400M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.