Arctic Sound 2T vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRV635Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1207680 ×2
Core clock speed722 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors378 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate5.776216.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs4120 ×2
TMUs8240 ×2
L2 Cache128 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length232 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed594 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s1.23 TB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 500 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 has 809% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 2T, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD 3650 and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD 3650 or Arctic Sound 2T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.