GMA X4500M vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameR350Eaglelake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 June 2003 (22 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speed378 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors117 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rate3.0244.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.064 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs810

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed338 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth21.63 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)10.0
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2003 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm

GMA X4500M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO and GMA X4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO is a desktop graphics card while GMA X4500M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 11 votes

Rate GMA X4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO or GMA X4500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.